For schools · applied for by teachers
Youth AI competency assessment
The Cortexys youth AI competency assessment is an online assessment that teachers apply for, covering five areas: understanding AI, checking information, responsible use, applying AI and digital safety. The school receives a bulk report with grade and class aggregates and lesson suggestions, and every student receives an individual report with results per area and what to try next.
8,790 KRW per studentList 12,000 KRW · about 27% off, final price
Mean per area by class
Sample data입문 0~39기초 40~64활용 65~84숙련 85~100
Self-rating vs. result · whole grade
Sample data- Understanding AIeven
- Checking informationover
- Responsible useeven
- Applying AIover
- Safety and balanceeven
Self-rating Correct rateTicks mark band boundaries
Two figures from the school report. Figures are illustrative.
Why assess before the lesson
To fit AI ethics and literacy lessons to a class you need to know where students stand. Three things stay invisible until asked.
Different starting points in one class
Students who do homework with AI every day sit beside students who have never tried it. The same lesson bores one and loses the other.
Overconfidence is the risky area
Students who believe they know AI best are the ones who trust manipulated video and copy answers as they are. Comparing self-ratings with results shows which class needs which lesson first.
Use patterns a teacher cannot see alone
Whether students hide AI use in homework or have put a friend's photo into an AI tool only shows up when asked. Class aggregates set the scope of the ethics lesson.
What it assesses
Five areas, asked through knowledge items and scenario items from school and daily life. The self-rating chosen at the start sits on the same scale as the result, separating areas where confidence leads from areas where ability leads. Items are not published.
- 01Knowledge
Understanding AI
How generative AI produces answers and why it can be wrong, training data and bias, what AI does well and badly.
- 02Judgement
Checking information
How to check the source of an AI answer, and how to spot plausible falsehoods and manipulated images or video, through scenario items.
- 03Attitude and judgement
Responsible use
Whether personal data or a friend's photo may go into an AI tool, where honest use ends in homework and exams, copyright and attribution.
- 04Skill
Applying AI
Writing a specific request, refining and asking again, and using AI for study and exploring careers.
- 05Behaviour
Safety and balance
Signs of over-reliance on AI companions, what to do about deepfakes and harassment, and how to ask an adult for help.
Self-rating
On the start screen students rate themselves in each of the five areas. Reports put that value and the result on one scale and mark large gaps as over- or under-estimation.
Item format
Each item gives a situation and three options plus "don't know". Text is kept short enough for a middle-school student to read alone, one screen per area.
How it runs
The teacher applies, forwards the links and hands each student their report. Everything else is on our side.
- 01
Teacher applies
Send school, grade, number of classes, headcount and preferred window through the inquiry form. We return a quotation and a student notice.
- 02
A link per class
Each class gets its own response link. Nothing to install, no sign-up, any browser on a school PC, tablet or phone.
- 03
Students respond
The start screen says what is measured and that it does not count towards grades. Students pick a self-rating, then answer one screen per area.
- 04
Reports to the school
A bulk report with grade and class aggregates and lesson suggestions, plus one individual report per student.
- 05
Lessons and a re-run
Pick lessons for each class's weaker areas, and run the same configuration again next term to see the change.
What each student receives
The individual report: results per area beside the class average, a comparison with the self-rating, and what to try next for the lowest area. No rank, no grade.
My result
Sample data- Understanding AIapplied
- Checking informationintro
- Responsible useapplied
- Applying AIskilled
- Safety and balanceapplied
Class averageTicks mark band boundaries
Compared with my self-rating
- Checking informationover
- Responsible useunder
- Applying AIunder
Self-rating Correct rateTicks mark band boundaries
What to try next · Checking information
- Pick one fact an AI gave you and check it against two sources
- Explain three clues to a manipulated photo to a friend
What the teacher receives
Each figure in the school report carries a lesson suggestion: what to cover for the whole grade and what each class should do first.
How students use AI · whole grade
Sample dataLesson suggestions by class
- Classes 1·2CheckTwo sessions on sources and spotting manipulated video
- Class 3ResponsibleOne session on honest use and attribution in homework
- Class 4CheckAdvanced: cross-checking a news story
The coloured chip is the class's lowest area.
Two reports
Both go to the school together. The bulk report carries aggregates only; the individual report carries that student's result only.
School report
- 01
Scores by grade and class
Mean and band for the five areas, one row per class, so the right lesson for each class is visible at a glance.
- 02
Self-rating and result
Self-ratings and area scores on one scale, with over- and under-estimated areas marked.
- 03
How students use AI
Which tools students use, for what and how often, whether they cite AI in homework, and signs of use that need attention.
- 04
Lesson suggestions
Priorities for AI ethics, information literacy and application lessons, matched to each class's weaker areas.
Individual student report
- 01
Result and band per area
Score and band for the five areas beside the class average. Which items were correct is not listed.
- 02
Compared with self-rating
The self-rating chosen at the start set against the result, showing where confidence leads and where ability leads.
- 03
What to try next
Two or three short practice tasks for the lowest area. No rank and no grade.
Score bands
Area scores read as four markers for what to learn next. Not grades.
- 입문0~39
- 기초40~64
- 활용65~84
- 숙련85~100
Price
One price per student. Both reports are included and nothing is added.
Per student
8,790 KRW12,000 KRW
Final price, about 27% off the 12,000 KRW list price.
- Response link per class and a student notice
- School report (grade and class aggregates, lesson suggestions)
- Individual report per student (results per area, what to try next)
We issue a quotation to fit school procurement. Tell us the grade and headcount when applying.
Apply for the assessmentProtecting students
Individual reports need a way to tell students apart, so what we collect, how far it goes and when it is deleted are fixed in advance.
Minimum identifiers
Only what an individual report needs. The school chooses class and number, or name. No phone numbers or dates of birth.
Never leaves the school
Identifiers and individual results go to the school only. Never to other organisations or advertising, never linked to other Cortexys services.
Not for grades or records
For lesson design and self-reflection. No rank, no grade; bands only guide what to learn next.
Fixed retention
Responses and identifiers are deleted after the period agreed with the school, or sooner if the school asks.
Guardian notices prepared together
We draft the purpose, items collected and retention wording for the parent notice to fit the school's procedure.
No credit for guessing
Every item has a "don't know" option. Lucky guesses blur lesson design, so not knowing is a valid answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What teachers ask before applying: identifiers, cost, report scope and how results are used.
Who applies and how?
The teacher in charge applies through the training inquiry form with the school name, grade, number of classes, headcount and preferred window. We send a response link per class and a notice for students, who open the link with nothing to install and no sign-up.
What does it cost?
8,790 KRW per student, the final price after a discount from the 12,000 KRW list price, with nothing added. It covers response links per class, the school report and every student's individual report. We issue a quotation to fit school procurement.
Are individual students identified?
Individual reports need the minimum identifier the school chooses: class and number, or name. It never leaves the school, and it is deleted after a set period once reports are sent. Guardian notices are prepared with the school to fit its procedure.
What does it assess?
Five areas: understanding AI, checking information, responsible use, applying AI, and safety and balance. Knowledge items and scenario items from school and daily life, with a self-rating at the start set against the result. Every item has a "don't know" option to reduce lucky guesses.
How are reports delivered?
Two things go to the school: a bulk report with grade and class aggregates and lesson suggestions, and an individual report for each student with results per area and what to try next. Individual reports reach students through their teacher.
Does it affect grades or school records?
No. It exists for lesson design and self-reflection, with no rank and no grade. Bands guide what to learn next and are not an achievement measure. This limit is stated on the response screen and in both reports.
What devices can students use?
Any browser on a school PC, tablet or phone. Each area is one screen and a submission cannot be reopened. We check in advance that the link opens on the school network.
Apply for the assessment →
The right AI lesson for a class starts with an assessment
Send the school, grade and headcount and we will return a quotation and schedule. 8,790 KRW per student.